Supreme Court: Promotion Suitability Must be Decided by Experts, Courts Cannot Create New Methods  ||  SC: Market Integrity is Paramount; Rule Violators Cannot Escape Liability by Citing Investor Gains  ||  SC: Plaintiff's Reply to Counterclaim in Commercial Suits Must Meet Written Statement Deadline  ||  SC: Pre-2016 Debt Recovery Tribunal Recovery Certificates Cannot Support Insolvency Notices  ||  SC: Children's Court Cannot Try Child as Adult Without Passing a Reasoned Order under JJ Act  ||  SC: Contractual Clauses Denying Interest on Security Deposits Does Not Violate Public Policy  ||  J&K&L HC: Unamended Pleading Loses Effect After Amendment; Party Cannot Benefit From Own Default  ||  Allahabad HC: Wife's Maintenance Need Not be Fixed at 25% of Husband's Net Income  ||  Kerala HC: Social Customs Alone Cannot Prove Bride Entrusted Gold to Husband or In-Laws  ||  Karnataka HC: Century Club Qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act Due to Land Grant    

Supreme Court: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Challenge Arbitrator’s Section 16 Decision - (29 May 2026)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court held that High Courts cannot exercise writ jurisdiction to interfere with an arbitral tribunal’s order passed under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as such intervention is impermissible under the statutory arbitration framework.

Tags : WRIT JURISDICTION; ARBITRATOR; ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved