Kerala High Court: ED Can Investigate Without FIR in Scheduled Offence Cases (CMRL Matter)  ||  Delhi High Court Upholds TRAI Rule Capping TV Advertisements at 12 Minutes Per Hour  ||  Supreme Court Directs High Courts to Deliver Judgments in 3 Months and Bail Orders in One Day  ||  Supreme Court: Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Negotiate Further After CoC Approval  ||  Supreme Court: Succession Law Applies, Not Primogeniture, to Ex-Royal’s Private Estate Inheritance  ||  Supreme Court: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Challenge Arbitrator’s Section 16 Decision  ||  Supreme Court: Sanyasi Status Cannot Be Ground to Reject Land Compensation Claim  ||  Supreme Court: Section 33(1)(a) of Arbitration Act Cannot Alter Nature of Interest in Award  ||  Supreme Court: Society Office Bearers Not Liable for Cheque Dishonour Without Active Business Role  ||  Supreme Court: Asking a Woman to Adjust in Marriage Does Not Amount to Cruelty By In-Laws    

Supreme Court: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Challenge Arbitrator’s Section 16 Decision - (29 May 2026)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court held that High Courts cannot exercise writ jurisdiction to interfere with an arbitral tribunal’s order passed under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as such intervention is impermissible under the statutory arbitration framework.

Tags : WRIT JURISDICTION; ARBITRATOR; ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved