SC Condemns Witch-Hunting, Says Superstition Continues to Override Constitutional Morality  ||  SC: Retired Judges Appointed to Central Industrial Tribunals Not Entitled to Pay Parity  ||  SC: Electricity Boards Liable for Electrocution Deaths under Strict, Not Absolute Liability  ||  Supreme Court Criticizes Courts For Conducting ‘Mini-Trials’ in Temporary Injunction Matters  ||  SC: Common Judgment in Suits by Same Plaintiff can be Challenged Through Composite Appeal  ||  Chandigarh Court Orders Meta to Take Down AI-Generated Video of Punjab MLA Sukhpal Khaira  ||  Delhi HC: Insolvency Professionals Must Collect & Deposit GST Even if they are Advocates  ||  Madras HC Rejects Election Petition Challenging Colachel MLA Tharahai Cuthbert  ||  Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt    

Supreme Court: Joint Disciplinary Proceedings Not Mandatory in Cases Involving Multiple Officers - (15 May 2026)

SERVICE

Supreme Court ruled that under Regulation 10 of the Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976, separate disciplinary proceedings can be initiated against a delinquent bank employee, as joint proceedings are not mandatory even when multiple officers are involved.

Tags : DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS; MULTIPLE OFFICERS; CANARA BANK REGULATIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved