Supreme Court: Joint Disciplinary Proceedings Not Mandatory in Cases Involving Multiple Officers  ||  Supreme Court: Transferred Students Cannot Claim Government Fees After College Loses Recognition  ||  Supreme Court: Arbitration Clause Applies When Earlier Agreement is Imported “Body and Soul”  ||  J&K&L High Court: Seasonal Labourers Cannot Be Regularised Amid Government’s Blanket Ban  ||  Delhi High Court: Silence Amid Sustained Vilification May Undermine Public Confidence In Judiciary  ||  Calcutta HC Stays Eastern Railway Eviction Drive Affecting Around 6,000 Slum Dwellers Near Station  ||  J&K&L HC: Repeated Arrests U/S 107 Crpc After UAPA Bail Can be Fresh PSA Detention Grounds  ||  Del HC: Arrest Memo Listing Only Reasons Cannot Substitute Person-Specific Grounds of Arrest  ||  SC: Hostile Witness Testimony Can Support Acquittal as Well, Not Only Conviction  ||  SC: Appointing Candidates on Contract Against Advertised Regular Posts is Patently Illegal    

Supreme Court: Joint Disciplinary Proceedings Not Mandatory in Cases Involving Multiple Officers - (15 May 2026)

SERVICE

Supreme Court ruled that under Regulation 10 of the Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976, separate disciplinary proceedings can be initiated against a delinquent bank employee, as joint proceedings are not mandatory even when multiple officers are involved.

Tags : DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS; MULTIPLE OFFICERS; CANARA BANK REGULATIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved