Bihar Tender Scam: Patna High Court Bars Media From Calling Accused 'Scamster' Before Trial  ||  Gujarat HC Terms Plea ‘Wholly Misconceived’ and Imposes Rs. 2 Lakh Cost over ASI Somnath Survey  ||  Gauhati HC Differs on Whether ED’s ‘Reason To Believe’ For Property Attachment is Confidential  ||  MP High Court Grants Bail To Tehelka Journalist, Noting Implication After Exposing Foeticide Racket  ||  Patna HC: Possessing Cough Syrup With under 2.5% Codeine Without Authorisation Attracts the NDPS Act  ||  Madras HC: Person Who Converts to Islam Cannot Claim Backward Class Muslim Status  ||  Madras High Court Lays Down Guidelines For Surrogacy Custody and Parentage Applications  ||  Bombay High Court: Residence Proof is Mandatory For RTE Neighbourhood School Admissions  ||  Madras HC Strikes Down TN Law Mandating Registrar’s Title Verification Before Property Registration  ||  Bombay HC Allows Galli News to Report Medical Negligence But Bars Defamatory Hospital Imputations    

Delhi High Court: Labour Courts Cannot Decide Disputed TA/DA Claims under Section 33C(2) of ID Act - (13 May 2026)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Delhi High Court held that under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, Labour Courts can only compute or recover pre-existing service benefits and have no jurisdiction to decide disputed entitlements or adjudicate claims like TA/DA.

Tags : LABOUR COURTS; INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT; SERVICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved