Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Bombay HC: Restricting Compensation For Wild Animal Damage to Select Species Violates Article 14 - (29 Apr 2026)

ENVIRONMENT

Bombay High Court has ruled that limiting compensation for crop and tree damage caused by wild animals to only certain specified species, while excluding others like birds, violates Article 14, as the classification lacks a reasonable nexus with the objective of compensating farmers for losses.

Tags : COMPENSATION; WILD ANIMAL; SPECIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved