Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations  ||  Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary  ||  Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother  ||  Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly  ||  Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay  ||  Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State  ||  Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders    

Bombay HC: Restricting Compensation For Wild Animal Damage to Select Species Violates Article 14 - (29 Apr 2026)

ENVIRONMENT

Bombay High Court has ruled that limiting compensation for crop and tree damage caused by wild animals to only certain specified species, while excluding others like birds, violates Article 14, as the classification lacks a reasonable nexus with the objective of compensating farmers for losses.

Tags : COMPENSATION; WILD ANIMAL; SPECIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved