Supreme Court Upholds the Constitutionality of Life Sentences Without Remission Until Natural Death  ||  Supreme Court: Service Benefits Can't be Refused Due to Missing ACRs Not Attributable to Employees  ||  Supreme Court: Courts May Grant Lesser Relief under Order VII Rule 7 CPC, But Not a Different Claim  ||  Supreme Court Dismisses Lokpal's Plea Against Delhi HC Order Quashing Probe into Defence Secretary  ||  SC Grants Bail to Two UAPA Accused, Citing 12-Year Incarceration and Violation of Article 21  ||  Madras High Court: Seeking Divorce over Wife's Accidental Hip Injury is Inhumane  ||  Kerala High Court Directs Stronger Audit and Financial Oversight in Guruvayur Devaswom  ||  Madras High Court Directs State and Judiciary to Expedite Rape and POCSO Trials  ||  Karnataka HC Upholds RTO's Power to Cancel Registration Secured by False Documents  ||  Karnataka HC: Bengaluru-Mysuru Corridor Could be Biggest Scam, Farmers Deprived of Land    

Bombay HC: Restricting Compensation For Wild Animal Damage to Select Species Violates Article 14 - (29 Apr 2026)

ENVIRONMENT

Bombay High Court has ruled that limiting compensation for crop and tree damage caused by wild animals to only certain specified species, while excluding others like birds, violates Article 14, as the classification lacks a reasonable nexus with the objective of compensating farmers for losses.

Tags : COMPENSATION; WILD ANIMAL; SPECIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved