J&K&L HC Quashes 65-Year-Old's Detention, says Cattle Smuggling isn't Public Disorder  ||  Karnataka HC Bars Denial of MV Inspector Posts over Experience with Non-Existent HGV/HPV Vehicles  ||  P&H HC: Lengthy Incarceration alone is No Substantial Change for Repeat Bail Plea  ||  Meghalaya HC Flags Amicus' Non-Appearance amid Lawyers' Strike, Stresses Loyalty to Justice  ||  MP HC: Arms Act doesn't allow Sports Firearm Licence Conversion to Self-Defence Category  ||  Delhi HC: Public Funding of LTC, CGHS Benefits doesn't Mandate Personal Disclosure under RTI  ||  Delhi HC: Fake Caste Certificate alone cannot Justify Removing Advocate from State Rolls  ||  Delhi HC Refuses to Stop Sale of 47 Law Books in Family Copyright Dispute  ||  Supreme Court: S. 394 IPC Conviction Requires Proof of Robbery or Attempted Robbery  ||  Supreme Court Questions MP HC's Cryptic Reduction of Murder Conviction as 'Shocking'    

Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor - (10 Apr 2026)

SERVICE

Supreme Court held that granting an extraordinary pension under the Uttar Pradesh Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 1981, falls within the Governor’s discretion and cannot be mandated by courts.

Tags : AUTHORITY’S DISCRETION   UTTAR PRADESH CIVIL SERVICES (EXTRAORDINARY PENSION) RULES   GOVERNOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved