Supreme Court: Borrowers Retain Redemption Rights if Balance is Paid After Auction Deadline  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Confirmation of Seizure under Section 37A Impacts Adjudication Proceedings  ||  SC: Blacklisting After Contract Termination is Not Automatic and Needs Independent Review  ||  Grand Venice Fraud Case: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Satinder Singh Bhasin  ||  SC: Senior Employee Cannot Claim Same Lesser Penalty As Subordinate; Bank Manager's Dismissal Upheld  ||  Madras HC: Governor Must Follow Cabinet's Advice on Remission Decisions, Regardless of Personal View  ||  Kerala High Court: Entrepreneurs Must Be Protected From Baseless Protests to Boost Industrial Growth  ||  J&K&L High Court: Second FIR Valid if it Reveals a Broader Conspiracy; 'Test of Sameness' is Key  ||  Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment    

Patna HC: Blanket Approach of Denying Public Employment to Individuals Named in an FIR is Unfair - (02 Apr 2026)

SERVICE

Patna High Court held that the sealed cover procedure cannot be used solely due to a pending FIR, emphasizing that denying appointment based on untested allegations violates constitutional principles of equality and fairness under Articles 14 and 16.

Tags : BLANKET APPROACH   PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT   FIR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved