Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt  ||  Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment  ||  Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution  ||  Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty  ||  Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry  ||  Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act  ||  NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another    

Supreme Court: Parties Have No Vested Right to Produce Additional Evidence at the Appellate Stage - (10 Mar 2026)

CIVIL

Supreme Court held that parties have no vested right to produce additional evidence at the appellate stage under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC, observing that it is the appellate court’s discretion to allow such evidence only when the specific conditions prescribed under the provision are satisfied.

Tags : VESTED RIGHT   ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE   APPELLATE STAGE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved