Authorities Holding Public Auctions Must Disclose All Known Encumbrances and Related Litigation  ||  SC: Compensatory Allowances Must Be Included While Computing Overtime Wages U/S 59 of Factories Act  ||  SC: NGT Has No Jurisdiction to Decide Disputes Relating to Building Plan Violations  ||  SC: Evidence is Often Fabricated Using AI And False Allegations are Rampant in Matrimonial Cases  ||  SC: While Declining to Quash an FIR, A High Court Should Not Direct Police To Follow Section 41A CrPC  ||  Allahabad High Court: Recruitment Rules Cannot Override Compassionate Appointments  ||  Rajasthan HC: Single Blunt Blow Causing Grievous Injury is Not Attempt to Murder Without Intent  ||  Karnataka High Court Holds Mining Leases Granted in Violation of Rule 22-D are Void Ab Initio  ||  Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry  ||  SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts    

Karnataka High Court Holds Mining Leases Granted in Violation of Rule 22-D are Void Ab Initio - (21 Jan 2026)

MINES AND MINERALS

Karnataka HC held that a mining lease granted in violation of the minimum area requirement under Rule 22-D is void under Section 19 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act Act and, being void ab initio, cannot qualify for any deemed extension under Section 8A(3) of the Act.

Tags : MINING LEASES   VIOLATION   VOID AB INITIO  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved