NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

NCLT Kochi: Avoidance Provisions under Insolvency Code Aim to Restore, Not Punish, Parties - (08 Jan 2026)

INSOLVENCY

NCLT Kochi clarified that avoidance provisions under the Insolvency Code are intended to reverse the preferential effect of certain transactions and restore the corporate debtor’s estate, rather than impose punitive liability on the beneficiaries of such transactions.

Tags : AVOIDANCE   INSOLVENCY   PUNISH  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved