Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Madras HC: Preventive Detention Laws are Draconian, Cannot be Used to Curb Dissent or Settle Politics - (02 Jan 2026)

CONSTITUTION

Madras High Court observed that preventive detention laws are draconian and must not be used to settle political scores or suppress dissent, emphasizing that authorities should exercise these powers sparingly and in good faith, with courts scrutinizing any misuse or abuse of such powers.

Tags : PREVENTIVE DETENTION   DISSENT   LAWS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved