SC: Consumers Cannot Bear Power Plant Depreciation Costs When No Electricity Was Supplied  ||  Supreme Court: Para-Teachers’ Regularisation Depends On Educational Standards Set By States  ||  Bombay High Court: State Cannot Withhold Aid to Child Homes While Supporting Ladki Bahin Yojana  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Seek to Strike off Wife’s Defence over Unpaid Litigation Costs  ||  Calcutta HC: Bank Accounts Cannot Be Frozen Solely on Complaints Filed Via MHA Cybercrime Portal  ||  J&K&L HC: Unregistered Agreement to Sell Can be Considered For Assessing Possession at Interim Stage  ||  Raj HC: Cybercrime Cases Can't be Quashed Only on Compromise as They Impact Society at Large  ||  Gujarat High Court: Separate Compensation is Payable For Stillborn Child in Railway Accident Case  ||  Delhi HC: Hymen Rupture is Not Required to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault under the POCSO Act  ||  Delhi HC: Organised Crime Groups Exploit Juveniles, Misuse Juvenile Justice Laws for Serious Crimes    

Supreme Court: Section 311 CrPC Should be Invoked Sparingly, Only When Evidence is Vital - (22 Dec 2025)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court set aside the Gujarat High Court’s order permitting the prosecution to recall an 11-year-old witness under Section 311 CrPC, holding that the provision should be used sparingly and only when the evidence is indispensable for ascertaining the truth.

Tags : INVOKED   EVIDENCE   PROSECUTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved