Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations  ||  Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary  ||  Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother  ||  Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly  ||  Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay  ||  Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State  ||  Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders    

SC: If Some Offences are Quashed By Compromise, the FIR For The Same Incident Cannot Continue - (20 Nov 2025)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court set aside the Bombay High Court’s Aurangabad Bench order that partially quashed an FIR, dropping some charges but retaining the dacoity charge, ruling that all offences arose from a single transaction and one continuous incident, making the FIR unsustainable.

Tags : OFFENCE   FIR   INCIDENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved