J&K&L HC Quashes 65-Year-Old's Detention, says Cattle Smuggling isn't Public Disorder  ||  Karnataka HC Bars Denial of MV Inspector Posts over Experience with Non-Existent HGV/HPV Vehicles  ||  P&H HC: Lengthy Incarceration alone is No Substantial Change for Repeat Bail Plea  ||  Meghalaya HC Flags Amicus' Non-Appearance amid Lawyers' Strike, Stresses Loyalty to Justice  ||  MP HC: Arms Act doesn't allow Sports Firearm Licence Conversion to Self-Defence Category  ||  Delhi HC: Public Funding of LTC, CGHS Benefits doesn't Mandate Personal Disclosure under RTI  ||  Delhi HC: Fake Caste Certificate alone cannot Justify Removing Advocate from State Rolls  ||  Delhi HC Refuses to Stop Sale of 47 Law Books in Family Copyright Dispute  ||  Supreme Court: S. 394 IPC Conviction Requires Proof of Robbery or Attempted Robbery  ||  Supreme Court Questions MP HC's Cryptic Reduction of Murder Conviction as 'Shocking'    

Supreme Court: Subsequent Purchaser Without Due Verification Bound by Previous Sale Agreement - (11 Nov 2025)

CIVIL

Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser who relies solely on the vendor’s claims without due diligence cannot claim protection under Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The bench noted that prior agreements to sell, even if unilaterally cancelled, remain enforceable.

Tags : PURCHASER   SALE AGREEMENT   SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved