Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP  ||  Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation  ||  SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights  ||  SC: Loans May be Treated as Deposits under MPID Act, Private Individuals as Financial Establishments  ||  Supreme Court: Preventive Detention Unwarranted When Ordinary Law Suffices to Maintain Order  ||  Supreme Court: Tenant’s Defence Cannot be Struck off Without Checking Wilful Rent Default  ||  Allahabad High Court: Disposing Non-Veg Food in Ganga May Hurt Hindu Religious Sentiments  ||  J&K&L High Court: Similarity With Police Dossier Alone Not Enough to Quash Preventive Detention  ||  Patna High Court: Convict on Bail Can Still Seek Premature Release    

Supreme Court: Subsequent Purchaser Without Due Verification Bound by Previous Sale Agreement - (11 Nov 2025)

CIVIL

Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser who relies solely on the vendor’s claims without due diligence cannot claim protection under Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The bench noted that prior agreements to sell, even if unilaterally cancelled, remain enforceable.

Tags : PURCHASER   SALE AGREEMENT   SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved