SC: Arrest & Remand Illegal if Grounds Not Given in Language Arrestee Understands  ||  SC: Judgment for Deceased Party is Null if Legal Heir was not Brought on Record Before Hearing  ||  SC: Hiding a Candidate’s Conviction Voids Election, Regardless of Whether it Influenced Results  ||  Delhi HC: Not Here to Monitor Delhi University, but Students Must Follow Law During Elections  ||  J&K&L HC: Paying Tax or GST Registration Doesn’t Legalize Unlicensed Business Activities  ||  Delhi HC: Victim’s Past or Character Cannot be Used to Suggest Consent in Assault Cases  ||  P&H HC: Constitution isn’t Privilege Charter; Reservation in Promotions Requires Statutory Amendment  ||  Kerala HC: Law Must be Amended to Hold Landowners Liable for Illegal Paddy Land Reclamation  ||  Bombay HC: Parents Saying Daughter was Unhappy, Wept Often not Enough to Convict under 498A IPC  ||  Kerala HC: Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists Cannot Use “Dr.” Without Medical Degree    

Calcutta High Court Rules Dunlop’s Second Appeal Not Maintainable under the Trade Marks Act - (06 Nov 2025)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Calcutta High Court reaffirmed that a second appeal against a Single Judge’s order is not maintainable under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. It held that once an appeal from the Registrar’s order is decided by a Single Judge, no further appeal lies before a Division Bench under Section 100A CPC.

Tags : TRADE MARKS ACT   DUNLOP   APPEAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved