Pat HC: “Living in adultery” Denotes Continuous Course of Conduct & Not Isolated Acts of Immorality  ||  J&K HC: IA Conducting Investigation in Violation of S. 17A of PC Act Doesn’t Vitiate Entire Process  ||  Allahabad HC: DM Has Power to Entertain Second Plea Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act Without Bar  ||  Bombay HC: Can Treat Predicate Offences Lodged Under BNS as Scheduled Offences under PMLA  ||  Finance Ministry Informs Delhi HC About Inducing Rs. 50 Coin  ||  Delhi HC: Popular Restaurant Chain ‘Swagath’ Files Case Alleging Trademark Infringement  ||  Kerala HC: Cannot Claim Reservation Benefit Retrospectively if Community Later Added in OBC List  ||  Kerala HC Raises Question on Toll Collection Amid Poor Road Condition  ||  HP HC: Once Judicial Officers Participate in Departmental Exam, they Cannot Challenge the Rules  ||  SC Initiates Suo Motu Action Over Agencies Summoning Lawyers for Advising Accused    

Cepco Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Narinder Pal Singh Chawla - (High Court of Delhi) (11 Jul 2016)

Mixed residential, commercial use envisaged in Delhi rent control

MANU/DE/1590/2016

Tenancy

Section 2(l)(iii) of the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 is applicable in a case where tenancy premises are residential-cum-professional, or vice versa, and the nature of the tenanted premises is primarily residential and no part is purely commercial, the Delhi High Court held.

In the instant case, the Appellant had granted residential tenancy to the deceased. Subsequently, it was discovered that the deceased was using the property in a commercial capacity as well. After his death, deceased’s wife inherited limited tenancy rights in respect of the property.

The court considering precedent in Gian Devi noted that since the dispute involved mixed residential and commercial use, it was not dealt with by the earlier case - which only looked at application of Section 2(1)(iii) of the Act from a commercial perspective. In present appeal, premises was adjudged to be used residentially, serving also a professional purpose - thus not excluding it from the remit of the Act.

Relevant : Gian Devi Anand v. Jeevan Kumar MANU/SC/0381/1985 Kamla Devi v. Satya P. Goel MANU/DE/0388/1986

Tags : RENT CONTROL   INHERITED RIGHTS   RESIDENTIAL   COMMERCIAL USE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved