SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

Delhi High Court: Prosecution Must Prove Victim under 16 for Pre-2013 Rape Cases to Secure Conviction - (29 Oct 2025)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court held that in cases filed before the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, the prosecution must prove that the minor rape victim was under 16 years of age to secure a conviction, emphasizing that age is a crucial element of the offence in such cases.

Tags : PROSECUTION   RAPE   CONVICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved