Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions  ||  Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award  ||  Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience  ||  Supreme Court: Photographing a Woman not Engaged in Private Acts Does not Constitute Voyeurism  ||  SC Directs UPSC to Permit Scribe Changes Till Seven Days Before Exams and Review Screen-Reader Use  ||  Madras HC: Freedom of Religion Cannot Extend to Disturbing Peace Within Temple Premises  ||  Delhi HC: Lokpal Cannot Form a Prima Facie View on Corruption Without Hearing The Official  ||  MP High Court: DRT Cannot Restrict or Impose Conditions on a Person's Foreign Travel  ||  Bombay HC: Results of Dec 2 And 20 Local Body Election Must be Declared Together  ||  Delhi HC: Employment Disputes Cannot be Treated as Commercial Cases under the Act    

Bombay HC: Appeal under Section 37 A&C Doesn’t Bar Fresh Arbitration Proceedings - (16 Oct 2025)

ARBITRATION

Bombay High Court held that the pendency of an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act does not prevent a party from initiating fresh arbitration if the earlier award has been set aside. It accordingly allowed a Section 11 application and appointed a sole arbitrator.

Tags : APPEAL   ARBITRATION   ARBITRATOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved