Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt  ||  Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment  ||  Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution  ||  Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty  ||  Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry  ||  Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act  ||  NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another    

Delhi HC Cancels “Croose” Trademark for Being Deceptively Similar to “Crocs” - (29 Sep 2025)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court, granting relief to multinational footwear brand Crocs, ordered the cancellation of the trademark registration for 'CROOSE' in Class 25, covering footwear. The court ruled that the 'CROOSE' mark is deceptively similar to the US-based brand Crocs.

Tags : CROOSE   CROCS   TRADEMARK  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved