Karnataka HC: A Neighbour Cannot be Charged With Matrimonial Cruelty under Section 498A IPC  ||  Revisional Power U/S 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act is Supervisory; HC Cannot Revisit Facts  ||  Poverty Cannot Bar Parole; Rajasthan HC Waives Surety For Indigent Life Convict, Sets Guidelines  ||  Delhi High Court: Late Payment of TDS Does Not Absolve Criminal Liability under the Income Tax Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Avoidance Provisions under Insolvency Code Aim to Restore, Not Punish, Parties  ||  Bombay High Court: In IBC Cases, High Courts Lack Parallel Contempt Jurisdiction over the NCLT  ||  Supreme Court: Concluded Auction Cannot Be Cancelled Merely To Invite Higher Bids at a Later Stage  ||  SC: In Customs Classification, Statutory Tariff Headings and HSN Notes Prevail over Common Parlance  ||  SC: Under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, Notice U/S 10(5) Must be Served on the Person in Possession  ||  Supreme Court: Only Courts May Condone Delay; Tribunals Lack Power Unless Statute Allows    

NCLAT: Audit Report Alone Not Enough to Prove Fraud in Commercial Deal Under Section 66(2) IBC - (29 Sep 2025)

INSOLVENCY

NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, held that a transactional audit report alone cannot serve as conclusive proof of fraudulent trading under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016, emphasizing that additional evidence is necessary to establish fraud in such commercial transactions.

Tags : AUDIT REPORT   COMMERCIAL DEAL   FRAUD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved