Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt  ||  Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment  ||  Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution  ||  Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty  ||  Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry  ||  Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act  ||  NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another    

NCLAT: Audit Report Alone Not Enough to Prove Fraud in Commercial Deal Under Section 66(2) IBC - (29 Sep 2025)

INSOLVENCY

NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, held that a transactional audit report alone cannot serve as conclusive proof of fraudulent trading under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016, emphasizing that additional evidence is necessary to establish fraud in such commercial transactions.

Tags : AUDIT REPORT   COMMERCIAL DEAL   FRAUD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved