Supreme Court: Ad Valorem Court Fees Apply to Appeals Seeking Statutory Land Acquisition Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Cruise Voyages Remain Shipping Business under Section 44B Despite Onboard Services  ||  Supreme Court: People Abandon Cattle on Roads But Object to Their Use For Food  ||  Supreme Court Stays CIC Decision Declaring NSE Subject to the RTI Act  ||  SC: Wife May Be Denied Interim Maintenance if Husband Ex Facie Establishes Adultery  ||  SC: Prior Testimony is Inadmissible without Section 299 CrPC Order against Absconder  ||  Supreme Court: Administrative Action Can't Be Invalidated Solely for Lacking Formal Order  ||  Calcutta High Court: Section 141 NI Act Does Not Apply to Sole Proprietorships  ||  Orissa High Court Criticizes Magistrate for Defying Direction in Cheque Bounce Case  ||  Delhi High Court Safeguards Yuvraj Singh's Personality Rights, Orders Deepfake Takedown    

SC: Simultaneous Statements by Multiple Accused under Section 27 Evidence Act Need Strict Scrutiny - (23 Sep 2025)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court observed that simultaneous disclosure statements by multiple accused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act require strict scrutiny. This is necessary to ensure the statements are genuine and to rule out any possibility of tutoring among the accused before admitting them as evidence.

Tags : STATEMENTS   EVIDENCE ACT   ACCUSED  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved