Supreme Court: Inclusion in Revised Select List Does Not Give TN MV Inspectors a Vested Right  ||  Bombay HC: ICC Cannot Hear Sexual Harassment Complaint over Non-Employer Transport Incident  ||  Ker HC Upholds Rule that Homeopathic Doctors Must Cancel Registration Before Enrolment as Advocates  ||  J&K&L HC: Evidence Negating Penetration Warrants Conviction For Attempt to Rape, Not Rape  ||  Karnataka High Court Rules on Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights in Grandfather’s Self-Acquired Property  ||  Madhya Pradesh HC: Police Can be Prosecuted for Custodial Violence Without Prior Sanction  ||  AP HP Criticized Authorities and Ordered Removal of an Ex-Serviceman’s Land From the Prohibited List  ||  Kerala High Court Upheld the Conviction of a Madrasa Teacher in a Child Sexual Assault Case  ||  Gauhati High Court: Pending Criminal Case Cannot Indefinitely Delay an MBBS Pass Certificate  ||  SC Took Suo Motu Action and Directed Odisha to Aid a Visually Impaired Man and His Mother    

SC: Simultaneous Statements by Multiple Accused under Section 27 Evidence Act Need Strict Scrutiny - (23 Sep 2025)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court observed that simultaneous disclosure statements by multiple accused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act require strict scrutiny. This is necessary to ensure the statements are genuine and to rule out any possibility of tutoring among the accused before admitting them as evidence.

Tags : STATEMENTS   EVIDENCE ACT   ACCUSED  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved