Supreme Court: Issues of Party Capacity and Maintainability Must Be Decided by Arbitral Tribunal  ||  Supreme Court: Omissions in Chief Examination Can Be Rectified During Cross-Examination  ||  Supreme Court: Items Given by Accused to Police Are Not Section 27 Recoveries under Evidence Act  ||  Gujarat High Court: Waqf Institutions Must Pay Court Fees When Filing Disputes in State Tribunal  ||  Allahabad High Court: Law Treats All Equally, State Cannot Gain Undue Benefit from Delay Condonation  ||  SC: SARFAESI Act Was Not Applicable in Nagaland Before its 2021 Adoption, Dismisses Creditor’s Plea  ||  SC: Lis Pendens Applies To Money Suits on Mortgaged Property, Including Ex Parte Proceedings  ||  Kerala HC: Civil Courts Cannot Grant Injunctions in NCLT Matters and Such Orders Can Be Set Aside  ||  Bombay High Court: Technical Breaks to Temporary Employees Cannot Deny Maternity Leave Benefits  ||  NCLAT: Appellate Jurisdiction Limited to Orders Deciding Parties’ Rights, Not Procedural Directions    

Supreme Court: Video Evidence Need Not be Played or Transcribed to be Admissible - (17 Sep 2025)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court held that a video recording of a contraband seizure is admissible without a transcript, provided a valid electronic certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act is submitted. The video need not be played before each witness shown in it for it to be considered admissible.

Tags : EVIDENCE   TRANSCRIBED   ADMISSIBLE   EVIDENCE ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved