NCLAT: Unenforced Equitable Mortgage is Corporate Debtor’s Asset, Not to Be Treated as Margin Money  ||  NCLT Approves Hindustan Unilever’s Ice Cream Business Demerger into Kwality Wall’s  ||  Supreme Court: Bar Councils Cannot Charge Over Rs 750 for Enrollment or Withhold Applicants’ Docs  ||  SC Cancels POCSO Conviction, Observing Crime Resulted from Love, Not Lust, After Marriage  ||  Supreme Court: Advocates Can be Summoned Only under S.132 BSA Exceptions with Prior Officer Approval  ||  Allahabad HC: Juvenile Conviction Cannot be Treated as Disqualification for Government Jobs  ||  Delhi HC: DV Act Rights of Daughter-in-Law Cannot Deny In-Laws’ Right to Reside in Home  ||  Delhi HC: Waitlist Panel Cannot Be Segregated, Vacancies Must Be Filled From Valid Waitlist  ||  Delhi HC: Matrimonial FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Couple’s Settlement Agreement is Not Executed  ||  Delhi HC Bars All India Carrom Federation from Using “India” or “Indian” in its Name    

Supreme Court: Video Evidence Need Not be Played or Transcribed to be Admissible - (17 Sep 2025)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court held that a video recording of a contraband seizure is admissible without a transcript, provided a valid electronic certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act is submitted. The video need not be played before each witness shown in it for it to be considered admissible.

Tags : EVIDENCE   TRANSCRIBED   ADMISSIBLE   EVIDENCE ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved