Supreme Court: Compassionate Appointees Cannot Later Claim Entitlement to a Higher Post  ||  NCLAT New Delhi: Insolvency Pleas Cannot Be Admitted When Information Utility Records Show a Dispute  ||  NCLAT: Issuing Cheques For Another Entity’s Liabilities Does not Constitute Operational Debt  ||  NCLAT: SEBI Penalties Imposed After Liquidation Begins are Not Admissible as Claims  ||  NCLT Reiterates That an Auction Purchaser is Not Liable For a Corporate Debtor’s Electricity Dues  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Interim Injunction Against 'Power Flex' in Bata’s Trademark Infringement Case  ||  Calcutta High Court: Mere Presence of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Cannot Bar Compensation to Heirs  ||  Kerala High Court: Review Petition Cannot Be Entertained Against an Order Refusing Arbitration  ||  J&K High Court: Umadevi Judgment Does not Justify Perpetual Temporary Employment  ||  SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants    

Gujarat HC: Writ Courts Interfering in Arbitral Procedure Orders Defies A&C Act’s Purpose - (15 Sep 2025)

ARBITRATION

Gujarat HC ruled that writ courts should interfere in arbitral procedural orders, only if, they are completely perverse, made in bad faith, or in rarest of rare cases. This ensures respect for the Arbitration & Conciliation Act’s intent to minimize judicial intervention in arbitration proceedings.

Tags : ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT   ARBITRAL PROCEDURE   RAREST OF RARE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved