Madras HC: Freedom of Religion Cannot Extend to Disturbing Peace Within Temple Premises  ||  Delhi HC: Lokpal Cannot Form a Prima Facie View on Corruption Without Hearing The Official  ||  MP High Court: DRT Cannot Restrict or Impose Conditions on a Person's Foreign Travel  ||  Bombay HC: Results of Dec 2 And 20 Local Body Election Must be Declared Together  ||  Delhi HC: Employment Disputes Cannot be Treated as Commercial Cases under the Act  ||  Supreme Court: Divorced Muslim Woman Can Reclaim Gifts Given to Husband at Marriage  ||  Supreme Court: Police and Courts Should Act as Initial Filters to Prevent Baseless Prosecutions  ||  SC: Maharashtra Can Acquire Land under Slum Areas Act, Respecting Owner's Preferential Rights  ||  Supreme Court: Excise Exemption on Cotton Fabrics is Denied if Any Related Process Uses Power  ||  NCLAT: IBC Auctions are Not Ordinary Contracts, and Market Volatility Does not Excuse Bid Defaults    

Bombay HC: Non-Traceability of Documents Alone Cannot Justify Secondary Evidence - (26 Aug 2025)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Bombay High Court while upholding CGIT Nagpur’s refusal to permit Hindustan Petroleum to present secondary evidence, has held that mere claims of missing documents, without a supporting affidavit, are insufficient to allow secondary evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM   SECONDARY EVIDENCE   MISSING DOCUMENTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved