Supreme Court Urged Railways to Drop the Term Second-Class Passengers  ||  Supreme Court: Employers Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointments Through Delays  ||  Supreme Court Explains How Testimony of a Dead Witness Can be Used Against an Absconding Accused  ||  SC Recommended Amending IBC to Ensure Fair Repayment Protection for MSME Operational Creditors  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction  ||  SC: Railways are Not Liable Unless Owner-Risk Goods Were Counted or Weighed  ||  SC: Courts and Prosecutors Must Expedite Trials For Jailed Accused  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies that Swear Words and Vulgar Expletives Alone do Not Constitute Obscenity  ||  Supreme Court: Nominated Town Panchayat Members Have No Voting Rights in Council Polls  ||  Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Sonam Wangchuk, Upholds His Hospitalization    

Mumbai Commission Holds Reliance Retail Liable for Defective AC Replacement Failure - (20 Aug 2025)

CONSUMER

South Mumbai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has held the Reliance Retail liable for deficiency in service after it failed to replace a defective AC despite admitting the defect. The Commission ordered replacement, Rs.10,000 compensation, and Rs.5,000 litigation costs to complainant.

Tags : CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT   RELIANCE RETAIL   MUMBAI COMMISSION   DEFECTIVE AC  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved