SC: Forfeiture of Earnest Money Impermissible When Both Buyer and Seller are at Fault  ||  Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence Cannot Defeat Speedy Trial; Pre-Trial Detention is Punishment  ||  SC: Terrorist Act under UAPA Includes Conspiracies to Disrupt Essential Supplies, Not Just Violence  ||  Supreme Court Directs Measures to Prevent False and Frivolous Complaints Against Judicial Officers  ||  SC: Mere Participation in Arbitration Doesn’t Bar Challenging Arbitrator; Waiver Must be in Writing  ||  SC: Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, the Plaintiff, as Dominus Litis, Cannot be Forced to Add a Defendant  ||  SC: Law Does Not Change With a New Bench; Decisions of a Coordinate Bench are Binding  ||  Delhi HC Absence of Formal Arrest under Section 311A Crpc Does Not Bar Giving Handwriting Samples  ||  Del HC: Security Guards Performing Duties Cannot Be Prosecuted For Wrongful Restraint or Molestation  ||  Bombay HC: Housing Society Earning From Telecom Towers Isn’t An ‘Industry’; Staff Get No Gratuity    

SC Orders BCI Probe After Party Denies Engaging Advocates in Fraudulent Settlement Case - (13 Aug 2025)

CIVIL

The Supreme Court has ordered the Bar Council of India to conduct an inquiry after a litigant, Harish Jaiswal, claimed he never engaged lawyers who allegedly entered into a fraudulent settlement in his name in a property dispute. BCI must submit a report by October 2025.

Tags : FRAUDULENT SETTLEMENT   BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA   SUPREME COURT   FORGERY   LEGAL ETHICS   ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD   PROPERTY DISPUTE   SLP RECALL   MISREPRESENTATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved