SC: Delhi HC Can Restrict Senior Advocate Designation to Its Own Retired Judges  ||  Supreme Court: ‘Himachal May Disappear’, Flags Environmental Crisis  ||  Delhi HC: Civil Courts Can Block Foreign Arbitration if it’s Oppressive  ||  Madras HC: No Political Symbols or Leader Photos in Welfare Ads  ||  Bombay HC: Fresh Corruption Trial Allowed After Valid Sanction  ||  Calcutta HC: Compromise Scheme Under Companies Act Overrides SARFAESI  ||  SC: Authority Imposing Minor Penalty Can Initiate Major Penalty Charges  ||  SC Slams HC for 2-Year Bail Delay, Calls for Sensitivity in Liberty Cases  ||  SC: Recalls Judgment in Bhushan Steel Case Citing Injustice Under Art. 142  ||  HP HC: No Detention Merely for Suspected Heroin in Blood    

Delhi High Court: Mere Surmise & Conjectures Not Enough to Prosecute Person u/s 276D of IT Act - (23 Jul 2025)

DIRECT TAXATION

Delhi High Court has observed that mere surmise and conjectures is not enough to prosecute a person alleging a criminal offence under Section 276D of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   SECTION 276D   CRIMINAL OFFENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved