SC: Consumers Cannot Bear Power Plant Depreciation Costs When No Electricity Was Supplied || Supreme Court: Para-Teachers’ Regularisation Depends On Educational Standards Set By States || Bombay High Court: State Cannot Withhold Aid to Child Homes While Supporting Ladki Bahin Yojana || Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Seek to Strike off Wife’s Defence over Unpaid Litigation Costs || Calcutta HC: Bank Accounts Cannot Be Frozen Solely on Complaints Filed Via MHA Cybercrime Portal || J&K&L HC: Unregistered Agreement to Sell Can be Considered For Assessing Possession at Interim Stage || Raj HC: Cybercrime Cases Can't be Quashed Only on Compromise as They Impact Society at Large || Gujarat High Court: Separate Compensation is Payable For Stillborn Child in Railway Accident Case || Delhi HC: Hymen Rupture is Not Required to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault under the POCSO Act || Delhi HC: Organised Crime Groups Exploit Juveniles, Misuse Juvenile Justice Laws for Serious Crimes

Recovery of confirmed demands during pendency of stay application- (Ministry of Finance ) (04 Jul 2016)

MANU/EXCR/0024/2016

Excise

The Ministry of Finance brought changes to its 2013 notification on the recovery of confirmed demands while assessee’s stay application remains pending, in light of court decisions.

Courts have not been in favour of the Department collecting confirmed demands from the assessee during pendency of the stay, unless the demand has been conformed by CESTAT or the High Court.

The Ministry, erring on the side of caution, stated that even in the case of demands confirmed by court, recovery should be initiated only after 60 days from the order of the court.

Relevant : Recovery of confirmed demand MANU/EXCR/0002/2013 Amendments to the Appeal provisions MANU/EXCR/0008/2014

Tags : EXCISE CONFIRMED DEMAND STAY APPLICATION

Share :