Supreme Court: Courts Have Sometimes Failed Arbitration, With Interference Curing No Disease || Supreme Court: Co-Heir Cannot Sell Other Heirs' Shares as Karta After Intestate Succession || SC: Casual Labourers With Temporary Status are Eligible For Pension Even Without Regularisation || Supreme Court: High Courts Must Record the Nature of Crime and Allegations While Quashing FIRs || Delhi HC Rejected Pernod Ricard’s Plea Against Denial of Wholesale Liquor License over Excise Case || Gujarat HC: Lalita Kumari Ruling Does Not Permit Deceased’s Kin to Invoke Art 226 For FIR Failure || Ker HC: Denying Disability Pension to Army Personnel Based on Unreasoned Medical Opinion is Invalid || Kerala HC Directs Family Courts to Follow Calcutta HC Custody Guidelines Till State Rules Framed || Allahabad HC Allows LIC Employees to Be Engaged as Census Enumerators and Supervisors For Duties || Supreme Court Unveiled Victim Protection Plan For Trafficking Survivors and Urged Legal Reforms

Recovery of confirmed demands during pendency of stay application- (Ministry of Finance ) (04 Jul 2016)

MANU/EXCR/0024/2016

Excise

The Ministry of Finance brought changes to its 2013 notification on the recovery of confirmed demands while assessee’s stay application remains pending, in light of court decisions.

Courts have not been in favour of the Department collecting confirmed demands from the assessee during pendency of the stay, unless the demand has been conformed by CESTAT or the High Court.

The Ministry, erring on the side of caution, stated that even in the case of demands confirmed by court, recovery should be initiated only after 60 days from the order of the court.

Relevant : Recovery of confirmed demand MANU/EXCR/0002/2013 Amendments to the Appeal provisions MANU/EXCR/0008/2014

Tags : EXCISE CONFIRMED DEMAND STAY APPLICATION

Share :