SC: High Courts Exercising Probate Jurisdiction Can Order Probes Into Estate Irregularities || SC: High Courts Exercising Probate Jurisdiction Can Order Probes Into Estate Irregularities || Supreme Court Grants Bail to Undertrial Jailed For 9 Years, Citing Violation of Article 21 Rights || Supreme Court: Appellate Courts Reversing Acquittal Must Themselves Hear Convicts on Sentence || SC: Party Accepting Extension of Arbitrator’s Mandate Cannot Later Challenge Award on Expiry Grounds || Supreme Court: Life Sentence Can Be Modified Into a Fixed-Term Sentence in Appropriate Cases || Supreme Court Upholds EC Authority to Conduct SIR of Electoral Rolls For Free & Fair Elections || Supreme Court Expresses Concern over NEET-UG 2026 Cancellation, Stating NTA Has Not Learned Lessons || Supreme Court: Off-Duty Anaesthetist Cannot be Held Criminally Liable For Nurse’s Procedural Error || Centre To Delhi HC: Eviction of Delhi Gymkhana Club Will be Carried Out After Due Notice under Law

Recovery of confirmed demands during pendency of stay application- (Ministry of Finance ) (04 Jul 2016)

MANU/EXCR/0024/2016

Excise

The Ministry of Finance brought changes to its 2013 notification on the recovery of confirmed demands while assessee’s stay application remains pending, in light of court decisions.

Courts have not been in favour of the Department collecting confirmed demands from the assessee during pendency of the stay, unless the demand has been conformed by CESTAT or the High Court.

The Ministry, erring on the side of caution, stated that even in the case of demands confirmed by court, recovery should be initiated only after 60 days from the order of the court.

Relevant : Recovery of confirmed demand MANU/EXCR/0002/2013 Amendments to the Appeal provisions MANU/EXCR/0008/2014

Tags : EXCISE CONFIRMED DEMAND STAY APPLICATION

Share :