Del. HC: For Wrongful Confinement, It Isn’t Necessary That Victim Must be Immobilized By Tying Hands  ||  Delhi HC: For Offence of Criminal Intimidation, Intention to Cause Alarm is Necessary  ||  Delhi High Court Restrains Zydus Lifesciences Limited from Selling Biologic Similar to Nivolumab  ||  Delhi HC: Surveyors and Loss-Assessors Work Impartially and Independently  ||  Calcutta HC: Maintenance is a Tool to Maintain Lifestyle  ||  SC: No Binding Arbitration Agreement if Clause Says Arbitration "May Be Sought"  ||  SC: Need to Have Guidelines for Investigating Agencies Summoning Lawyers Over Legal Advice  ||  SC Suggests HCs to Make Rule Mandating Disclosure of Antecedents & Earlier Pleas in Bail Applica.  ||  SC: Remedy under Order XLI Rule 4 CPC Doesn’t Apply When All Defendants Jointly Appeal  ||  SC: No Restriction Imposed on Trial Court’s Power through Section 32 of NDPS Act    

Raj. HC: Can’t Extend ‘Child Specific’ Safeguards to Victim to Attaining Majority During Trial - (30 May 2025)

CRIMINAL

Rajasthan HC has held that procedural safeguards given under Section 3392) and 37 of POCSO Act, 2012 cannot be extended to victim who attained majority during trial as such an approach would subvert both the legislative intent and the constitutional requirement of parity in procedural fairness.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   CHILD SPECIFIC   PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved