SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat  ||  SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy  ||  SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay  ||  SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution  ||  SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff  ||  Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates  ||  Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail  ||  Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense    

President Asks SC: Can Court Fix Timeline for President to Make a Decision on Bill Reserved to Her - (15 May 2025)

ADMINISTRATIVE

President Droupadi Murmu while making a 14 point reference to the SC under Article 143 of the Constitution of India has asked the Court if it can impose timeline for the President to make a decision on a bill reserved to her by the Governor in absence of a constitutionally prescribed timeline.

Tags : DROUPADI MURMU   SUPREME COURT   ARTICLE 143  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved