NCLAT: In Absence of Contractual Clause Interest for Delayed Payments Can’t Form Part of OD  ||  NCLAT: Can Correct Inadvertent Typographical Errors in Orders Passed by NCLT under NCLT Rules  ||  NCLAT: To Satisfy Requirement of S.8 Service of Demand Notice on Registered E-Mail of CD Sufficient  ||  Delhi HC Closes Suit by Hamdard Against Baba Ramdev’s ‘Sharbat Jihad’ Remark  ||  Delhi HC: Can Consider Documents Filed with Plaint to Determine ‘Cause of Action’  ||  Sikkim HC: Section 29A as Amended in 2019 is Applicable on All Arb. Proceedings Pending at the Time  ||  AP HC: Preliminary Enquiry Report Loses Its Significance, Once Regular Enquiry is Initiated  ||  SC: Can’t Take Cognizance of Offence Under S.186 IPC on Police Report/Chargesheet  ||  SC: Can Admit Unregistered Agree. to Sell as Evidence to Prove Contract in Specific Performance Suit  ||  SC Directs Reservation of Post of Treasure for Women Lawyers in Gujarat High Court    

SC: It is Constitutional to Fix Pecuniary Jurisdiction Based on Value of Consideration - (30 Apr 2025)

CONSUMER

SC while dismissing challenge to Sections 34, 47 and 58 of the CP Act, 2019 has stated that determination of jurisdiction of commissions on the basis of value of consideration paid for purchase of goods and services has rational nexus to the object of provisioning hierarchy of judicial remedies.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PECUNIARY JURISDICTION   VALUE OF CONSIDERATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved