SC: For Granting Environmental Clearance, Valid DSR a Mandatory Prerequisite  ||  NCLAT: Under IBC there is No Provision Mandating RP to Share Valuation Report  ||  NCLAT: NCLT/NCLAT Cannot Adjudicate Employment Contract Disputes Under IBC  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Reject App. for Approval of RP Solely on Basis of Withdrawal of Consent by CoC Members  ||  J&K HC: S. 37 of NDPS Act Comes Into Play When Bail of Accused is Being Considered on Merits  ||  Delhi HC: In National Capital, Permission for Felling of More Trees to be Supervised by CEC  ||  Registrar General of P&H HC Warns of Contempt in Case of Recording of Court Proceedings  ||  SC: States to Identify Laws Discriminating Against Persons Affected with Leprosy  ||  SC: Recommendations Made by SC Collegium for Judge Appointments to be Cleared Expeditiously  ||  SC: Where Serviceman Discharged from duty by Authority Onus of Proving Disability Lies on Authority    

SC: Arbitral Autonomy Must Be Respected and Judicial Interference Should Remain Minimal - (30 Apr 2025)

ARBITRATION

SC has observed that the role of the court under Section 34 of the A&C is clearly demarcated. It is a restrictive jurisdiction and has to be invoked in a conservative manner. The reason is that arbitral autonomy must be respected and judicial interference should remain minimal.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ARBITRAL AUTONOMY   JUDICIAL INTERFERENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved