NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

J&K HC: S. 34 POCSO Act Vests Jurisdi. in Special Court to Determine Age of Both Offender & Victim - (28 Apr 2025)

CRIMINAL

Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that Section 34 of the POCSO Act vests jurisdiction with the Special Court not only to determine the age of the offender but it also vests jurisdiction with it to determine the age of the victim.

Tags : J&K HIGH COURT   SECTION 34   SPECIAL COURT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved