SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

Bombay HC: Arbitration Clause Giving Unilateral Power Does Not Render the Agreement Invalid - (25 Apr 2025)

ARBITRATION

Bombay High Court has observed that a clause in an arbitration agreement giving option to only one party to opt out of the agreement is not invalid per se and such agreement can be saved either by eliminating the option or by giving bilateral rights.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION CLAUSE   UNILATERAL POWER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved