Supreme Court: Inclusion in Revised Select List Does Not Give TN MV Inspectors a Vested Right  ||  Bombay HC: ICC Cannot Hear Sexual Harassment Complaint over Non-Employer Transport Incident  ||  Ker HC Upholds Rule that Homeopathic Doctors Must Cancel Registration Before Enrolment as Advocates  ||  J&K&L HC: Evidence Negating Penetration Warrants Conviction For Attempt to Rape, Not Rape  ||  Karnataka High Court Rules on Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights in Grandfather’s Self-Acquired Property  ||  Madhya Pradesh HC: Police Can be Prosecuted for Custodial Violence Without Prior Sanction  ||  AP HP Criticized Authorities and Ordered Removal of an Ex-Serviceman’s Land From the Prohibited List  ||  Kerala High Court Upheld the Conviction of a Madrasa Teacher in a Child Sexual Assault Case  ||  Gauhati High Court: Pending Criminal Case Cannot Indefinitely Delay an MBBS Pass Certificate  ||  SC Took Suo Motu Action and Directed Odisha to Aid a Visually Impaired Man and His Mother    

NCLAT: Under Section 99 of IBC Ten-Day Time Period is Directory Not Mandatory - (09 Apr 2025)

INSOLVENCY

NCLAT New Delhi bench has held that under Section 99 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 the ten day period within which the Resolution Professional has to submit the report after appointment is directory not mandatory.

Tags : NCLAT NEW DELHI   SECTION 99   RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved