Bombay HC: National Security Justifies Denial of Police Clearance Certificate  ||  Bombay HC: Comic Remarks Without Malicious Intent Not Religious Insult  ||  J&K&L High Court: Scandalous Allegations Against Judicial Officers in Pleadings Impermissible  ||  P&H HC: Writ Petition Against Private Trust's Contractual Employment Dismissed  ||  Gujarat HC: Customary Divorce Entitles Daughter to Family Pension  ||  Calcutta HC: ECI's Prerogative to Deploy Central Employees as Counting Supervisors Upheld  ||  Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers    

Supreme Court: Must Not Rigidly Interpret Three-Month Limitation Period under A&C Act - (07 Apr 2025)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has observed that for challenging an arbitral award the three-month limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 must not be interpreted rigidly as exactly ninety days. Rather it should be interpreted as three calendar months.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   THREE-MONTH LIMITATION   THREE CALENDAR MONTHS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved