Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  SC Holds Landowners Who Accept Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Seek Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigations and Long Delays in Chargesheets Can Justify Quashing  ||  Delhi HC: Arbitrator Controls Evidence and Appellate Courts Cannot Reassess Facts  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration    

NCLAT: In absence of privity of contract, application u/s 9 of IBC not maintainable - (28 Mar 2025)

INSOLVENCY

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has observed that where there is no privity of contract or any sort of Debtor-Creditor relationship between the Applicant and CD, the application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is not maintainable.

Tags : PRIVITY OF CONTRACT   MAINTAINABILITY OF APPLICATION   DEBTOR-CREDITOR RELATIONSHIP   THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved