SC: Absence of Independent Witnesses is Not Fatal if Injured Eyewitness Testimony is Sterling  ||  Supreme Court: Prosthetic Limb Costs Must Be Compensated To Restore Victims’ Dignity  ||  Supreme Court: Probate Can be Revoked For Non-Impleadment of Parties and Suppression of Facts  ||  SC: Plaint Cannot be Rejected For Valuation or Court Fee Defects Without Chance to Rectify  ||  SC Rules Government Grants Act Overrides Rent Law, Sets Aside Eviction Proceeding Against Union Govt  ||  SC: Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction in Boundary Dispute Between Maharashtra Panchayat & Municipality  ||  Allahabad HC: Two Criminal Cases Insufficient to Label a Person as 'Goonda' and Harm Reputation  ||  Bom HC: Sprinkling Mustard Without Ill Intent Before a House is Not an Offence under Black Magic Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Preventive Detention Invalid When Based on Speculative Fear of Election Disturbance  ||  Bombay High Court: POSH Act Penalises False Complaints by Women But Not Those Who Instigate Them    

NCLAT: In absence of privity of contract, application u/s 9 of IBC not maintainable - (28 Mar 2025)

INSOLVENCY

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has observed that where there is no privity of contract or any sort of Debtor-Creditor relationship between the Applicant and CD, the application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is not maintainable.

Tags : PRIVITY OF CONTRACT   MAINTAINABILITY OF APPLICATION   DEBTOR-CREDITOR RELATIONSHIP   THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE   2016  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved