Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations  ||  Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary  ||  Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother  ||  Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly  ||  Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay  ||  Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State  ||  Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders    

J&K HC: Indian Army doesn’t Fall Within the Definition of ‘Industry’ - (25 Mar 2025)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Jammu and Kashmir High Court while setting aside Labour Court’s order directing reinstatement of petitioners serving as porters in the Indian Army, has held that the Army does not fall within the definition of an 'Industry' and thus, the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the case.

Tags : JAMMU AND KASHMIR   LABOUR COURT   INDIAN ARMY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved