NCLAT: Can File Appeal against NCLT Order Initiating Insolvency Process against Personal Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Assets Reflecting in Corporate Debtor’s Balance Sheet form Part of Liquidation Estate  ||  NCLAT: Adjudicating Authority Must Conduct Independent Assessment under IBC  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Preclude Financial Creditors from Filing Applic. in Case of Settlement Agreement Breach  ||  NCLT: Can’t Call Speculative Investment a 'Financial Debt' in Absence of Commercial Effect of Borrowi  ||  NCLAT: Committee of Creditors Within its Right to Resolve to Liquidate Go Airlines  ||  AP HC: Revealed Particulars of Invest. Not Adequately Substantiated Can Damage Reputation of Persons  ||  J&K HC: Administrative Officers Can’t Claim Seniority on Basis of Unfilled Vacancies  ||  Bombay High Court: One Needs to be Mindful of the Object Behind the Consumer Protection Act  ||  J&K HC: Can’t Put Accused under Prev. Detention Only because His Release Affects Public Confidence    

Del. HC: Conviction u/s 138 of NI Act Can’t Qualify as Reason for Appellate Court to Seek 20% Deposit - (20 Mar 2025)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court has observed that conviction of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 does not qualify as a reason for Appellate Court to direct deposit of 20% of fine or compensation under Section 148 of the Act.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   APPELLATE COURT   SECTION 138  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved