Karnataka HC: State Has Fundamental Duty to Supply Drinking Water Fit for Human Consumption  ||  Raj. HC: Can’t Extend ‘Child Specific’ Safeguards to Victim to Attaining Majority During Trial  ||  Delhi High Court: Sadhguru Seeks Protection against Infringement of his Personality Rights  ||  Delhi High Court Tells Mohak Mangal to Remove Words like ‘Gunda Raj’ from Video against ANI  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Observations on Mumbai Gateway of India Jetty Project  ||  Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over Delay by Delhi HC in Deciding Bail Plea  ||  SC Quashes Rape Case against Man Who Backed Out from Marriage  ||  Allahabad High Court Refers Question on High Court's Power to Quash FIR to 9-Judge Bench  ||  Delhi HC: Online Applications for ‘No Entry Permits’ Must be Scrutinised  ||  Delhi High Court: It is Not Necessary to Use Trademark in Physical Form    

Del. HC: Conviction u/s 138 of NI Act Can’t Qualify as Reason for Appellate Court to Seek 20% Deposit - (20 Mar 2025)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court has observed that conviction of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 does not qualify as a reason for Appellate Court to direct deposit of 20% of fine or compensation under Section 148 of the Act.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   APPELLATE COURT   SECTION 138  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved