SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

Cal HC: To Prove Fraud in Arbitral Award, Important to Demonstrate Unethical Behaviour of Arbitrator - (11 Mar 2025)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has observed that in order to prove that passing of award has been vitiated by fraud, it is important for the parties to show that arbitrator’s unethical behaviour surpassed all moral standards.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   UNETHICAL BEHAVIOUR   ARBITRAL AWARD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved