Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction  ||  Delhi High Court: Software Receipts Not Taxable on PE Basis Already Rejected by ITAT  ||  Delhi High Court: Statutory Appeals Cannot Be Denied Due to DRAT Vacancies or Administrative Delays  ||  J&K&L HC: Failure to Frame Limitation Issue Not Fatal; Courts May Examine Limitation Suo Motu  ||  Bombay HC: Preventing Feeding Stray Dogs at Society or Bus Stop is Not 'Wrongful Restraint'  ||  Gujarat HC: Not All Injuries Reduce Earning Capacity; Functional Disability Must Be Assessed  ||  Delhi HC: Framing of Charges is Interlocutory and Not Appealable under Section 21 of NIA Act    

Cal HC: To Prove Fraud in Arbitral Award, Important to Demonstrate Unethical Behaviour of Arbitrator - (11 Mar 2025)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has observed that in order to prove that passing of award has been vitiated by fraud, it is important for the parties to show that arbitrator’s unethical behaviour surpassed all moral standards.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   UNETHICAL BEHAVIOUR   ARBITRAL AWARD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved