Delhi HC: Disclosure of Company Disputes to Concerned Party Doesn’t Amount to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Dealings in Other Properties Don’t Affect Right to Evict for Bonafide Need  ||  Supreme Court: No Exclusive Quota for Advocates in District Judge Direct Recruitment  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Education Must Start Early, Not Just From Classes IX to XII  ||  Supreme Court: Delay in Filing Written Statement During COVID Limitation Extension Allowed  ||  Supreme Court: Fake Driver’s License Doesn’t Free Insurer Unless Owner Allowed Violation  ||  Supreme Court: Railway Accident Claims Aren’t Criminal Trials; No Need for Strict Proof  ||  Supreme Court: Criminal Courts Can Only Correct Clerical Errors, Not Review Judgments  ||  Supreme Court: Arbitration Right Remains Despite Arbitration Clause Becoming Inoperable  ||  Supreme Court: Minor Can Repudiate Guardian’s Voidable Sale by Conduct After Majority    

J&K HC: Burden of Proof that Seized Samples were Not in Safe Custody Doesn’t Lie on Accused - (05 Mar 2025)

CRIMINAL

Jammu and Kashmir High Court has held that the burden of proof that seized samples were not in safe custody does not lie on the accused rather it lies on the prosecution to establish their safe handling and ensure that tampering was impossible.

Tags : JAMMU AND KASHMIR   SAFE CUSTODY   SEIZED SAMPLES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved