SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat  ||  SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy  ||  SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay  ||  SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution  ||  SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff  ||  Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates  ||  Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail  ||  Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense    

SC: When Appointing Authority Accepts Equivalence of Qualification, Courts should Avoid Interference - (24 Feb 2025)

SERVICE

SC has held that in circumstances where the appointing authority has not objected to the qualifications of the candidate and there is no apparent or glaring difference in the qualifications, there is no reason for courts to interfere and set-aside the appointments made after due consideration.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   APPOINTING AUTHORITY   QUALIFICATIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved