NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

SC: No Entitlement on Job Contractors to Pension for Pre-Regularisation Period - (24 Feb 2025)

SERVICE

Supreme Court has observed that there is a clear distinction between the employees who are in work-charged establishment vis-à-vis those who are in job contract establishment and Job Contractors cannot be entitled to pension for pre-regularisation period unlike work-charged employees.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PRE-REGULARISATION PERIOD   JOB CONTRACTORS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved