Lok Sabha Confirms Imposition of President Rule in Manipur  ||  AP HC: Court Possesses Limited Scope of Judicial Review in Transfer Cases on Account of Exigencies  ||  Bom. HC: Can’t Evict Tenants Under Arbitration Act if Occupying Premises Falling under DA  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Permanent Injunction in Favour of ‘Peak XV Partners’  ||  Bombay HC: Condition that Younger Candidate Would be Preferred Over Older Candidate Violates COI  ||  Kar. HC Refuses to Entertain Petition Seeking Implementation of Circular Regarding Usage of ‘Dalit’  ||  Kar. HC: Rapido, Uber Can’t Operate in State Unless Relevant Guidelines Issued  ||  Delhi HC: Preserve CCTV Footage When Complaint against Dept. Regarding Illegal Detention in Received  ||  SC Refuses to Direct States to Establish Public Libraries  ||  SC: To Prevent Re-Litigation, Quasi-Judicial Bodies are Bound by Principles of Res-Judicata    

SC: No Entitlement on Job Contractors to Pension for Pre-Regularisation Period - (24 Feb 2025)

SERVICE

Supreme Court has observed that there is a clear distinction between the employees who are in work-charged establishment vis-à-vis those who are in job contract establishment and Job Contractors cannot be entitled to pension for pre-regularisation period unlike work-charged employees.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PRE-REGULARISATION PERIOD   JOB CONTRACTORS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved