Karnataka HC: A Neighbour Cannot be Charged With Matrimonial Cruelty under Section 498A IPC  ||  Revisional Power U/S 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act is Supervisory; HC Cannot Revisit Facts  ||  Poverty Cannot Bar Parole; Rajasthan HC Waives Surety For Indigent Life Convict, Sets Guidelines  ||  Delhi High Court: Late Payment of TDS Does Not Absolve Criminal Liability under the Income Tax Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Avoidance Provisions under Insolvency Code Aim to Restore, Not Punish, Parties  ||  Bombay High Court: In IBC Cases, High Courts Lack Parallel Contempt Jurisdiction over the NCLT  ||  Supreme Court: Concluded Auction Cannot Be Cancelled Merely To Invite Higher Bids at a Later Stage  ||  SC: In Customs Classification, Statutory Tariff Headings and HSN Notes Prevail over Common Parlance  ||  SC: Under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, Notice U/S 10(5) Must be Served on the Person in Possession  ||  Supreme Court: Only Courts May Condone Delay; Tribunals Lack Power Unless Statute Allows    

NCLAT: Non-Registration of Charge not Sine Qua Non for Creditor to be Treated as ‘Secured Creditor’ - (18 Feb 2025)

INSOLVENCY

NCLAT New Delhi bench has held that non-registration of “charge” as per Section 77 of Companies Act, 2013 is not a sine qua non for a Creditor to be treated as a Secured Creditor under section 3(30) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).

Tags : NCLAT NEW DELHI   SINE QUA NON   SECURED CREDITOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved