Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt  ||  Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment  ||  Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution  ||  Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty  ||  Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry  ||  Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act  ||  NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another    

NCLAT: Non-Registration of Charge not Sine Qua Non for Creditor to be Treated as ‘Secured Creditor’ - (18 Feb 2025)

INSOLVENCY

NCLAT New Delhi bench has held that non-registration of “charge” as per Section 77 of Companies Act, 2013 is not a sine qua non for a Creditor to be treated as a Secured Creditor under section 3(30) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).

Tags : NCLAT NEW DELHI   SINE QUA NON   SECURED CREDITOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved