SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

NCLAT: Can’t Change Related Party Status Estb. through Agreement by Sending Notice against Terms - (18 Feb 2025)

INSOLVENCY

NCLAT New Delhi bench has held that by sending a termination notice against the expressed terms of the agreement, related party status established through an agreement under Section 5(24) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) cannot be changed.

Tags : NCLAT NEW DELHI   RELATED PARTY STATUS   TERMINATION NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved