NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

Ker HC: Court is not Expected to Blindly Pass Order in Ex- Parte Proceedings - (17 Feb 2025)

CIVIL

Kerala Court has held that absence of the opposite party (OP) does not exempt the court from adhering to the fundamental legal principles. The burden of the litigant to prove his case to the satisfaction of the court is not vanished by the absence of the OP.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   EX-PARTE   OPPOSITE PARTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved