Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

J&K HC: Object Underlying Law of Limitation is Based on “Interest Reipublicae Up Sit Finis Litium” - (04 Feb 2025)

LIMITATION

J&K HC has observed that object underlying law of limitation is based on maxim “interest reipublicae up sit finis litium” meaning that it is for general welfare that a period be put to litigation. A long passage of time alone is not enough to turn down plea of an applicant and shut door against him.

Tags : J&K HIGH COURT   LAW OF LIMITATION   GENERAL WELFARE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved