Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams  ||  SC: Central Government Employees under CCS Rules are Not Covered by the Payment of Gratuity Act  ||  Supreme Court Holds CrPC Principles on Discharge and Framing of Charges Continue under BNSS  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Must Independently Assess SC/ST Act Charges in Section 14A Appeals    

Cal. HC: Must File Application u/s 8 of A&C Act Before or Simultaneously With Written Statement - (14 Jan 2025)

ARBITRATION

Cal. HC has held that while determining alimony the question is not what are the actual daily requirements of the wife but as to what is the perceived requirement of the wife, taking into account not only her daily bread but her other necessities commensurate with the status of both spouses.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   WRITTEN STATEMENT   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved