Delhi High Court: Phonographic Performance Limited Not Entitled to Grant Licenses without Registratio  ||  SC: Limitation Begins From the Date When the Cause of Action First Accrued  ||  SC: Language is a Medium for Exchange of Ideas Not Become a Cause of Division  ||  SC: Once Plaint in Respect of Main Relief Stands Barred, Other Reliefs Claimed Also Fall Down  ||  SC: Wildlife Warden of Telangana to Take Immediate Steps to Protect Wildlife  ||  SC: Violence During Protests Against Waqf Amendment Act is Disturbing  ||  UK SC: Trans Women Not Included in Definition of ‘Woman’ under Equality Act, 2010  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 32 to Challenge Supreme Court’s Own Judgments  ||  SC: If Suits Mention Cash Transactions Above ?2 Lakh, Court Must Report it to IT Department  ||  SC Takes Objection of Allahabad High Court Order Blaming Victim in Rape Case    

Del. HC: For Filing Additional WS After, Comm. Court Act Doesn't Prevent Appl. of Order 8 Rule 9 CPC - (13 Jan 2025)

CIVIL

Delhi HC has stated that there is nothing in the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 to suggest that the provisions of Rule 9 of Order VIII CPC shall not be applicable to Commercial Suits post the expiry of period of One Hundred and Twenty (120) days for filing of a written statement.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   WRITTEN STATEMENT   COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved