Supreme Court Urged Railways to Drop the Term Second-Class Passengers  ||  Supreme Court: Employers Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointments Through Delays  ||  Supreme Court Explains How Testimony of a Dead Witness Can be Used Against an Absconding Accused  ||  SC Recommended Amending IBC to Ensure Fair Repayment Protection for MSME Operational Creditors  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction  ||  SC: Railways are Not Liable Unless Owner-Risk Goods Were Counted or Weighed  ||  SC: Courts and Prosecutors Must Expedite Trials For Jailed Accused  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies that Swear Words and Vulgar Expletives Alone do Not Constitute Obscenity  ||  Supreme Court: Nominated Town Panchayat Members Have No Voting Rights in Council Polls  ||  Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Sonam Wangchuk, Upholds His Hospitalization    

Bom. HC: Right to Travel is Required to be Not Only Recognised but Should be Made More Meaningful - (10 Jan 2025)

CIVIL

Bombay HC has observed that in the contemporary times traveling abroad cannot be considered to be a fanciful affair but has become an essential requirement of modern life. Thus, the right to travel is required to be not only recognised but should be made more meaningful.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   RIGHT TO TRAVEL   MEANINGFUL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved