SC: Daughter Doesn't Lose Ties With Natal Family After Marriage, Such Stereotype is Unconstitutional  ||  SC: Limitation For Filing S.34 Appeal Starts From Disposal of S.33 Application, Allowed or Rejected  ||  SC: In Cases of Drug Trade Threats to the Nation, Sovereignty Prevails over Personal Liberty  ||  Delhi HC: Plaintiff Can Obtain a Refund of Court Fees After an IBC Resolution Plan “Settlement”  ||  Ker HC: Default Bail is Available if Final Report is E-Filed After 5 Pm on Last Statutory Day  ||  J&K&L HC: NDPS Act Provisions Extending Investigation Time Apply to Narco-Terror Cases under UAPA  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Have Sometimes Failed Arbitration, With Interference Curing No Disease  ||  Supreme Court: Co-Heir Cannot Sell Other Heirs' Shares as Karta After Intestate Succession  ||  SC: Casual Labourers With Temporary Status are Eligible For Pension Even Without Regularisation  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Must Record the Nature of Crime and Allegations While Quashing FIRs    

Bom. HC: Right to Travel is Required to be Not Only Recognised but Should be Made More Meaningful - (10 Jan 2025)

CIVIL

Bombay HC has observed that in the contemporary times traveling abroad cannot be considered to be a fanciful affair but has become an essential requirement of modern life. Thus, the right to travel is required to be not only recognised but should be made more meaningful.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   RIGHT TO TRAVEL   MEANINGFUL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved