NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

SC: High Court’s interference in Arbitral Proceedings Permissible Only if Order Perverse - (06 Jan 2025)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has stated that High Court’s interference in Arbitral Proceedings in exercise of its Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 or 227 of Constitution of India is permissible only if the order is completely perverse i.e. that the perversity must stare in the face.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS   WRIT JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved